Protect plans, sketches, and renders of your projects
Dated proof of prior authorship for every stage of your design — from the first sketch to the final render, for €2.
The situation
You present a full renovation project to a client: moodboard, inspiration boards, 2D plans, 3D renders, material selection, lighting plan. The client finds the quote too high. A few months later, you walk past the property and see construction underway — and you recognize your project, executed by another contractor or by the client themselves, with your design choices, your materials, your spatial arrangement.
Or: you're a licensed architect, you deliver a feasibility study to a project owner. The full contract doesn't go ahead. Later, you discover that another firm was hired and that your architectural concept was reused almost identically.
These situations are far more common than the profession publicly acknowledges. The problem is rarely the absence of legal rights — it's the absence of dated proof of your work at a specific moment.
The real risk
Most jurisdictions following the Berne Convention protect architectural works, plans, and sketches from the moment of creation. Interior designers benefit from the same copyright protection whenever their work meets the originality threshold.
But protection only activates with evidence. Without an opposable date, you can demonstrate neither that your work existed at a given time, nor that it was yours. The resulting disputes are numerous: tender materials leaking to a competitor, projects delivered but not paid and executed anyway, architectural concepts reused in subsequent projects.
The decision of the Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille on March 20, 2025 (AZ Factory case, RG 23/00046) was the first European court ruling to recognize the probative value of blockchain timestamping. The case concerned fashion sketches, but the legal principle applies to any digital document — including plans, renders and concept boards.
What you can anchor
For an architecture project, what matters goes well beyond the final render handed to the client:
- Sketches and concept notebooks (scans or photos)
- Inspiration boards, moodboards, references
- 2D plans — frozen PDF exports from AutoCAD, ArchiCAD, Revit
- 3D models — PDF exports, screen captures from SketchUp, Revit, Blender, Rhino
- Photorealistic renders (V-Ray, Lumion, Twinmotion)
- Technical detail books (sections, elevations, details)
- Material and finish selections (technical sheets, sample photos)
- Lighting plans, layout grids, furniture plans
- Concept notes, written design rationale, architectural memos
- Cost estimates and pricing notes
- Client correspondence (emails exported as PDF)
Why the bundle changes everything
This may be the profession where the bundle takes on its full meaning. The natural reflex at project completion is to keep only the presentable renders — the ones that go into the portfolio. The initial moodboard, the first sketches, the intermediate plan versions, the rejected iterations: all of this is often discarded or archived without any intent of evidence.
That's precisely the opposite of what you should do if you want to build proof that holds up in a dispute. An anchoring of only the final render shows that you held that file on that date. A bundle containing the full chronology — moodboard, first sketches, three plan versions, final render, material selection, cost estimate — shows the design trajectory, the cluster of evidence that, beyond the date, supports your authorship.
For €2 — the price of a single anchoring — you can fit up to 50 MB of files in a single bundle. A complete architecture project, exported as frozen PDFs, easily fits within that envelope.
A real case
The most frequent dispute in the profession is not plagiarism between peers, but the client who doesn't pay and executes the project anyway. An interior designer carries out a full study (boards, plans, renders, material selection), delivers the dossier, the client finds the fee too high, and ultimately executes the project themselves or via a cheaper contractor — reusing the design choices.
Without dated evidence, the designer has nothing but the working files on their hard drive. With an ETcH bundle anchored at the moment of dossier delivery, they hold an indisputable record: on that precise date, these files existed in this form in their possession.
From there, several remedies exist — most of them without a lawyer and without a court — to stop the infringement or seek compensation: cease and desist letters, platform takedowns, and if necessary, legal action. All share one prerequisite: being able to prove prior authorship. The ETcH bundle satisfies that prerequisite.
The relevant European precedent is the AZ Factory decision from the Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille (March 20, 2025, RG 23/00046): the court recognized the probative value of blockchain timestamps to establish the prior existence of original creations. The principle transfers directly to architectural plans, renders and sketches.
How to use it
Finalize your deliverables in the version you want to protect. Export as frozen PDFs — native files (DWG, SKP, RVT) modify their metadata when opened, which invalidates the proof.
Gather the project files you consider relevant to the proof: sketches, intermediate plans, renders, material selection, cost estimates, relevant correspondence.
Drop them on etchproof.eu SHA-256 fingerprints are computed in your browser — no file ever leaves your machine.
Keep the proof ZIP delivered after anchoring. It contains the PDF certificate, the manifest, the Ethereum transaction, and your original files. This is what holds up in case of dispute — keep at least two copies, in two different locations.
Honest limits
ETcH timestamping proves prior existence, not authorship. To support authorship in a dispute, you'll often need other elements: witness statements, correspondence, evidence of iterative design — which is exactly what bundling enables.
Timestamping does not replace a bailiff's report (or your jurisdiction's equivalent) if the dispute goes to court. But that report can be issued months or years after the anchoring: in the AZ Factory case, the bailiff's report came more than fourteen months after the original anchoring. You pay €2 now — and only the cost of the report (typically a few hundred euros) if a dispute actually arises.